Short answer:
get all your news from the
television.
Long answer:
Anne and I enjoyed a 9-day vacation earlier this month. Our only news source was our hotel room television. For more than a week, our only news sources
were the broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, NBC) and all-news cable channels (CNN, Fox, and MSNBC).
Compared to what a typical
person should know to functionally and productively participate in and
contribute to our globe, the TV news left me feeling woefully inadequate. Here are a few specific thoughts about what
people who rely solely on TV news are missing:
Now, I’m the first to admit
I’m a news junkie. Daily, I read my
local Austin American-Statesman; scan the pages
of The Wall Street Journal
and The New York Times;
review a half-dozen online news summaries from such sources as Slate and Wired; check Best
of the Web at OpinionJournal.com; listen to two hours of
National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition” getting ready for work,
two hours of “All Things Considered”
in the afternoons, and Public Radio International’s
“The World” and “Marketplace” on the way home (find these
excellent programs streaming online through NPR affiliates such as KUT, KERA, and WAMU); and,
regularly consult my personalized Netscape portal, Google News, and The Drudge Report. Weekly, I valiantly attempt cover-to-cover
attention to the Austin Business Journal, The New Yorker,
The Weekly Standard,
and The Economist. Monthly, I receive The Atlantic Monthly, Texas Monthly, Harper’s, and
two editions of “Vital Speeches of the Day.” I typically have a book of at least passing
relevance to current events on my nightstand.
But I don’t think anyone has
to be a news junkie of my magnitude to appreciate that telling people that the
reason gas prices are going up is due to
Likewise, attention directed
to dramatic audio or video footage that detracts from the actual news value of
the story fails to honor the intelligence of viewers who might actually derive
some benefit – or even desire to take some affirmative action – after learning
that their cellular phone provider is probably responsible for the industry’s
failure to implement potentially lifesaving technology.
The transplant recipient stories
were probably most egregious: by focusing almost solely on the emotional
component of this admittedly emotional story, the TV news providers utterly and
inexcusably failed to share valuable public health information that could
increase the number of organ donors and decrease the lethality of medical
errors, to inform viewers about some of the most tragic human rights violations
occurring anywhere on the planet, and to remind people that the U.S. blood
supply is only as safe as the blood supply in the countries from which we
import blood.
These considerations are
fundamental to understanding some of the most important issues we face as
citizens of our communities, our nation, and the globe. Our vacation was a painful and valuable
reminder that we all have to work harder than the television news to learn and
understand them.
© David B. Schlosser, 2003. Use permitted with attribution to David B. Schlosser at www.analects-ink.com.
You may manage
Weekend Readings by visiting www.analects-ink.com,
or clicking the commands below:
p
Subscribe
to Weekend
p
Unsubscribe to Weekend
p
Add a friend or colleague to the list of Weekend Reading recipients