The Wall Street Journal,
Politics & Policy
By
Dennis Farney
OVERLAND
PARK, Kan.—That classic Darwinian concept, the survival of the fittest, is
taking on a whole new meaning here in one of the nation’s most closely watched
congressional races.
As
three Republicans battle for the GOP congressional nomination in these
Republican-leaning suburbs, a key issue that is evolving is evolution itself.
More specifically, the issue is last year’s decision by the Kansas Board of
Education, controlled by Christian conservatives, to allow public schools to
de-emphasize Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution.
Evolution
is an evolving issue in the Kansas GOP congressional primary.
That,
says moderate candidate Greg Musil, makes
“We
can act like we don’t care that Jay Leno laughs at us, but we’re losing jobs
and new businesses because of this,” says Mr. Musil, a lawyer and former
Political
Pay Dirt
It
is far from certain that Mr. Musil has struck political pay dirt. But it is
certain that he has struck a nerve.
Conservative
candidate Phill Kline, the early front-runner, would clearly prefer to talk
about just about anything else but evolution. Tax cuts are his big issue. “Mr.
Kline does not wish to participate in this story,” his spokesman replies when
initially approached about an interview. Eventually Mr. Kline relents and
issues a dry riposte.
“The
‘missing link’ in Greg’s argument is its relevancy to a congressional
campaign,” he says. “I think he ought to be running for the school board. What
this does is really make it impossible for Greg to win a general-election
campaign because he’s telling a large percentage of the district population
that they’re country bumpkins.”
At
issue is the state education board’s decision last year to give individual
districts the option of whether or not to teach the
Deleting
Topics
The
state board also deleted from state standards such topics as the estimated age
of the Earth, out of deference to religious conservatives who hold to a literal
interpretation of the Book of Genesis. And it deleted questions that suggest
that humans and nonhumans—men and apes, for example—may have evolved from a
common ancestor.
In
practice, few districts have dropped evolution outright, although some teach it
along with opposing theories. But the board’s guidelines have been deplored by
GOP Gov. Bill Graves, a moderate, by
Meanwhile,
the stand-up comics have had a field day. “You look around
As
it happens, this month marks the 75th anniversary of the famous
Scopes “monkey trial” in
“I
believe the next
Differing
Positions
The
three Republicans offer voters three distinct positions. Mr. Musil thinks the
state board’s decision was wrongheaded. Mr. Kline, a powerful state legislator,
says “the board got two out of three right. Evolution ought to be taught as a
theory and not as a fact. And there should be a local option.” However, Rep.
Kline thinks the board went too far in removing questions from the standards.
Dr.
Morsch, a physician who now devotes most of his time
to business and humanitarian affairs, vigorously advocates the teaching of
evolution as a “major, major part of our scientific heritage.” But personally,
he says, “I can’t buy
“I
believe the name of that designer is God,” he says. But he notes that others in
the camp might simply attribute creation to some force that is beyond present
human understanding.
Dr.
Morsch, like Rep. Kline, didn’t set out to make
evolution a focus of his campaign. A top priority is his call for a bipartisan
commission to hammer out a health-insurance plan for the 44 million people who
lack coverage.
Energizing
Effort
“What
Greg Musil has accomplished is to define ‘us’ and ‘them,’ “
says Jeffrey Colyer, a plastic surgeon who
considered entering the GOP nomination race himself. But in attempting to
energize moderates, Mr. Musil has also energized Christian conservatives. His
statements, combined with an intense conservative-vs.-moderate race for the
local seat on state school board, almost ensure a big conservative turnout on
Aug. 1.
But
the GOP evolution brouhaha does give comfort to Rep. Moore, a man who needs all
the help he can get. With the GOP clinging to a narrow six-seat majority in the
House, both parties have targeted this district. A host of interest groups is
piling in. Rep. Moore has worked to position himself as a moderate who can work
in a bipartisan fashion, a mandatory strategy in a district where registered
Democrats come in third behind registered Republicans and independents. Two
years ago he won by fewer than 10,000 votes out of about 200,000 cast. But this
presidential election year is expected to boost turnout by as many as 100,000
voters, and George W. Bush will run strongly here. Rep. Moore calls the board’s
decisions “a step backward.”
The
big question is whether Republicans can unite after their primary, says Vince Snowbarger, the GOP incumbent whom Mr. Moore unseated in
1998. “I’m not sure the divisions have healed yet. It will take another
election to find out.”
Write
to Dennis Farney at dennis.farney@wsj.com1
URL for this Article:
http://interactive.wsj.com/archive/retrieve.cgi?id=SB962837706711299727.djm
Hyperlinks in this
Article:
Copyright © 2000 Dow
Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.